What is the difference between electioneering and lobbying

These require different approaches to organizing collective action than market mechanisms alone provide. Such benefits are termed concentrated, typically in contrast to their costs, which are widely borne. Stadium construction projects at taxpayer expense or with substantial public subsidies, for example, typically produce large wealth gains for a few managers and share-holders while taxpayers collectively foot the bulk of the construction bill and associated risks. Typically, these are individuals with a background in government and a network of governmental connections which they can market to private groups willing to pay for help with getting their concerns and proposals heard by key government decision makers.

The ranks of contract lobbyists are full of former legislators, legislative staffers, bureaucrats, party operatives, and lawyers with reputations for expertise in particular policy areas and hefty contact lists. Interest groups may engage in direct lobbying by mobilizing their members to contact policy makers, or by hiring a contract lobbyist or having in-house lobbyists to undertake the action.

Why did these particular groups arise? One theory describes the origins of interest groups as a reaction to a disturbance in society. When the normal social, economic, or political routine is disturbed, a group or groups emerge to restore the status quo ante or to take advantage of the disturbed conditions to press for policy changes.

Interest groups use electioneering as one tactic to support the broader goals of the group. One theory ascribes the origins of interest groups to the efforts of individual policy entrepreneurs.

A charismatic and energetic individual who identifies a problem and is convinced of a particular solution or approach to the problem then rallies supporter to his or her cause by forming a group to pursue the goals. This free rider problem makes it difficult to do things of great value to everyone but of little value to any one person. Examples include the difficulties of maintaining a clean environment or a working democracy with high levels of citizen participation.

A grass roots campaign, for instance, seeks to mobilize ordinary citizens to take part in an election campaign or a cause involving an important issue. In a democratic system, grass roots support is an essential legitimizing force which can also lead to astro turfing, manufacturing the appearance of grass roots activity to advance particular interests. These include full-time lobbyists in the permanent employ of a group as well as managers, executives and other employees of the group or organization who perform other tasks in addition to lobbying government.

A group must maintain its membership, often by providing benefits material, solidary, or purposive to those members. It must also vigorously pursue its goals the members' interests ; often it must also pursue secondary goals, in order to increase its chances of achieving its primary goals.

The three broad tactics of interest groups in the public arena are electioneering, lobbying, and litigating. The McCain-Feingold law sought to close that loophole by establishing a bright-line rule: If unions and corporations want to engage in electioneering during the regulated time period, they must pay for their broadcast ads using money raised in political action committees, not through their general treasury funds. In addition, campaign-reform supporters say, unions and corporations remain free to use broadcast ads for pre-election lobbying.

The ads must simply avoid mentioning a candidate's name. The Supreme Court upheld the electioneering communications provision in a 5-to-4 vote in December But the high court did not make clear whether corporations and unions would be permitted to file future constitutional challenges to the law or whether any disputes would simply be resolved by the Federal Election Commission.

A footnote in the decision suggests the majority did not intend to close the door on future court challenges, Bopp says. In footnote 88, the majority justices wrote in part: "We assume that the interests that justify the regulation of campaign speech might not apply to the regulation of genuine issue ads. A factor clouding the case is the expectation that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor will soon retire from the court if Samuel Alito wins Senate confirmation as her replacement.

Justice O'Connor was among the five-member majority that upheld the campaign-finance provision in Already a subscriber? Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.

Your subscription to The Christian Science Monitor has expired. You can renew your subscription or continue to use the site without a subscription.

If you have questions about your account, please contact customer service or call us at This message will appear once per week unless you renew or log out.

Skip to main content Skip to main menu Skip to search Skip to footer. Search for:. Monitor Daily Current Issue. A Christian Science Perspective. Monitor Movie Guide. Monitor Daily. Photos of the Week. You've read of free articles. Subscribe to continue. Mark Sappenfield. Our work isn't possible without your support.

Digital subscription includes: Unlimited access to CSMonitor. The Monitor Daily email. No advertising. Cancel anytime.